Do you remember the Georgia man the film accused of committing a crime by depositing five ballots??
State investigators found that he was legally returning ballots for himself and members of his household. The film’s publisher later apologized to him, withdrew the film and book, and ended their distribution. D’Souza also apologized and acknowledged that the surveillance videos might not have been properly matched to the geolocation data.
Then Georgia investigators asked True the Vote for the evidence underlying its broader allegations. Under a court order, the organization said it had no names, contact information, or supporting documents to provide.
No video presented in the film showed the same person illegally depositing fraudulent ballots at multiple drop boxes. It showed lawful activity and supplied an unproven story around it.
is this the film you were speaking on as if its evidence?
You are cherry picking a few occurrences . The only way Dems can win is thru cheating, stuffing ballot boxes, stopping vote counting on nite of election to determine how many votes are needed to catch up and win
If there was no cheating by Democrats why do Democrats so strenuously oppose an audit? If I didn’t cheat I would want an examination to show I was telling the truth. Why are Democrats so afraid of election audits of people who voted. Enquiring minds want to know. W. Manion, MDPhDJDMBA
Georgia’s Republican-led election system counted the presidential ballots three times, including once by hand. The Trump campaign requested one of those recounts. Each count confirmed Joe Biden’s victory.
An audit is a defined procedure used to test a result. It is not an unlimited license to keep investigating until your preferred candidate wins.
If by an “audit of people who voted” you mean checking eligibility and participation records, those records are already subject to review. If you mean connecting individual voters to their ballots, the secret ballot prevents that by design.
So which specific audit did Democrats prevent, and under what law?
“Democrats oppose audits” is a claim that fails under 5 minutes of work.
FTP, you really believe a man who campaigned from his basement and attracted dozens - not thousands, not tens of thousands - to his campaign events garnered more popular votes than anyone in history? You haven't seen the video of the GA polling station closing down due to a "water break" and then pulling suitcases of ballots out from under a table? Why were counters in WI covering windows and refusing to allow republican observers? How about the affidavit from the postman who testified he was paid to drive a mail truck full of ballots from NY to PA? What about the observers and whistleblowers who've stated batches of ballots arrived that were clearly just pushed through a copy machine? These examples are numerous - people testifying, people signing affidavits, people saying they literally saw the machine switch their votes. Hell, you don't recall watching in real time on the news, as the vote count in PA instantaneously reduced Trumps count by thousands and increased Biden's by the same amount? Even if your TDS causes you to ignore all of that, there is this: In multiple swing states and major counties Trump was in the lead at midnight, and then, well after midnight, what people much smarter than me say is statistically impossible happened: tens of thousands - enough to swing elections - of ballots arrived 99% of which voted for Biden. Many had no votes for candidates down ballot. The ballots just showed a vote for Biden. Even if we concede that the majority of people mailing in ballots are Democrats, a realistic number might be 60%, 65%, maybe even 70%. But 99%? Impossible. If there is no massive cheating, why does the Dem party oppose voter ID? Why do many blue states practice automatic voter registration, mail ballots indiscriminately, practice ballot harvesting, and take weeks and months to "count" and "find" ballots? Finally, why are blue states refusing to provide their voter roles to the DOJ to prove that they don't allow noncitizens and dead people to vote?
It’s no mystery, it’s the GOP. And i don’t want this administration to have any information about me. They’ll find a way to charge everyone who wants a copy or make money from it some other way.
Being a lifelong Chicagoan, I am convinced that there is election fraud. I’m not convinced that it was decisive in the 2020 election.
Currently, I’m more suspicious that outside forces are aiding the DSA.
I am certain that DSA is working actively with our adversaries overseas as a fifth column to bring down what they call the American empire, because they themselves have said so.
I have no interest or need to defend the DSA’s foreign policy. Much of its rhetoric is openly hostile to American power, and some of its members have displayed an indefensible softness toward authoritarian governments.
But “fifth column” is a factual allegation, not a synonym for radical politics. It implies that the DSA is being financed, directed, coordinated with, or operationally assisted by a foreign adversary.
Saying that the “American empire” should end proves that some DSA members oppose American power. It does not prove that Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, or Venezuela controls or assists them. Ideological overlap operational coordination.
If the DSA has admitted working with a foreign government, provide the exact statement, speaker, date, and context. I will examine it under the same standard I am applying to Trump’s claims.
I am not lowering the evidentiary standard because I dislike the accused. That is the entire point of the article.
Ever hear of the movie 2000 mules by D’nesh D’Souza? There is video evidence of ballot stuffing in drop boxes.
Do you remember the Georgia man the film accused of committing a crime by depositing five ballots??
State investigators found that he was legally returning ballots for himself and members of his household. The film’s publisher later apologized to him, withdrew the film and book, and ended their distribution. D’Souza also apologized and acknowledged that the surveillance videos might not have been properly matched to the geolocation data.
Then Georgia investigators asked True the Vote for the evidence underlying its broader allegations. Under a court order, the organization said it had no names, contact information, or supporting documents to provide.
No video presented in the film showed the same person illegally depositing fraudulent ballots at multiple drop boxes. It showed lawful activity and supplied an unproven story around it.
is this the film you were speaking on as if its evidence?
You are cherry picking a few occurrences . The only way Dems can win is thru cheating, stuffing ballot boxes, stopping vote counting on nite of election to determine how many votes are needed to catch up and win
Elections do not become legitimate only when your preferred candidate wins.
Exactly! And they will always want to cheat and steal! They are evil as the stuff comes out of each orifice
If there was no cheating by Democrats why do Democrats so strenuously oppose an audit? If I didn’t cheat I would want an examination to show I was telling the truth. Why are Democrats so afraid of election audits of people who voted. Enquiring minds want to know. W. Manion, MDPhDJDMBA
the audit happened.
Georgia’s Republican-led election system counted the presidential ballots three times, including once by hand. The Trump campaign requested one of those recounts. Each count confirmed Joe Biden’s victory.
An audit is a defined procedure used to test a result. It is not an unlimited license to keep investigating until your preferred candidate wins.
If by an “audit of people who voted” you mean checking eligibility and participation records, those records are already subject to review. If you mean connecting individual voters to their ballots, the secret ballot prevents that by design.
So which specific audit did Democrats prevent, and under what law?
“Democrats oppose audits” is a claim that fails under 5 minutes of work.
FTP, you really believe a man who campaigned from his basement and attracted dozens - not thousands, not tens of thousands - to his campaign events garnered more popular votes than anyone in history? You haven't seen the video of the GA polling station closing down due to a "water break" and then pulling suitcases of ballots out from under a table? Why were counters in WI covering windows and refusing to allow republican observers? How about the affidavit from the postman who testified he was paid to drive a mail truck full of ballots from NY to PA? What about the observers and whistleblowers who've stated batches of ballots arrived that were clearly just pushed through a copy machine? These examples are numerous - people testifying, people signing affidavits, people saying they literally saw the machine switch their votes. Hell, you don't recall watching in real time on the news, as the vote count in PA instantaneously reduced Trumps count by thousands and increased Biden's by the same amount? Even if your TDS causes you to ignore all of that, there is this: In multiple swing states and major counties Trump was in the lead at midnight, and then, well after midnight, what people much smarter than me say is statistically impossible happened: tens of thousands - enough to swing elections - of ballots arrived 99% of which voted for Biden. Many had no votes for candidates down ballot. The ballots just showed a vote for Biden. Even if we concede that the majority of people mailing in ballots are Democrats, a realistic number might be 60%, 65%, maybe even 70%. But 99%? Impossible. If there is no massive cheating, why does the Dem party oppose voter ID? Why do many blue states practice automatic voter registration, mail ballots indiscriminately, practice ballot harvesting, and take weeks and months to "count" and "find" ballots? Finally, why are blue states refusing to provide their voter roles to the DOJ to prove that they don't allow noncitizens and dead people to vote?
JUST REMEMBER
Trump is a CRIMINAL
AND DESERVES EVERYTHING HES exposed for, on the record and under oath. Blanch is using the SYSTEM TO LIE AS HE BREAKS IT and must be disbarred.
By the way democrats do not need to jump through hoops to PROVE this heathen is GUILTY of so much law-breaking, including DISMANTLING OUR DEMOCRACY.
It’s wide in the open and
It’s no mystery, it’s the GOP. And i don’t want this administration to have any information about me. They’ll find a way to charge everyone who wants a copy or make money from it some other way.
Being a lifelong Chicagoan, I am convinced that there is election fraud. I’m not convinced that it was decisive in the 2020 election.
Currently, I’m more suspicious that outside forces are aiding the DSA.
I am certain that DSA is working actively with our adversaries overseas as a fifth column to bring down what they call the American empire, because they themselves have said so.
I have no interest or need to defend the DSA’s foreign policy. Much of its rhetoric is openly hostile to American power, and some of its members have displayed an indefensible softness toward authoritarian governments.
But “fifth column” is a factual allegation, not a synonym for radical politics. It implies that the DSA is being financed, directed, coordinated with, or operationally assisted by a foreign adversary.
Saying that the “American empire” should end proves that some DSA members oppose American power. It does not prove that Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, or Venezuela controls or assists them. Ideological overlap operational coordination.
If the DSA has admitted working with a foreign government, provide the exact statement, speaker, date, and context. I will examine it under the same standard I am applying to Trump’s claims.
I am not lowering the evidentiary standard because I dislike the accused. That is the entire point of the article.
I said I suspect. Suspicion is a hypothesis that does not require evidence.